Any new work soon? |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Any new work soon?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Willl there be any new work soon? | |
| ID: 1057 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi all, | |
| ID: 1062 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Will there be any new work soon? Scored me about 4 WU's... I'm pumped... clonal plants growing across a prairie... sounds good to me :) ____________ | |
| ID: 1063 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Hi all, Hi Malek Any idea how long these WUs may last? | |
| ID: 1078 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned. | |
| ID: 1079 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi, just joined the project. My Core i7 burns through the tasks with median completion time of 19 minutes each. Sounds like I joined just in time for all the work to do. :) | |
| ID: 1080 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned. Do you know if the next batches will be as long as this one? | |
| ID: 1082 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Some are as long as this one and some are even longer. | |
| ID: 1084 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Thanks for the update Malek. It's nice to have some VP work to do :o) | |
| ID: 1090 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Thanks Malek, | |
| ID: 1093 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow. | |
| ID: 1095 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow. Any news? ____________ Dublin, CA SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat | |
| ID: 1100 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow. Hope some will be released today for my birthday. | |
| ID: 1101 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow. Well, happy belated birthday Ray. My birthday came and went yesterday and still nothing :( ____________ | |
| ID: 1102 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow. Even without the units I get to collect Social Security retirement with this one. This is good, with the pension, income from web sites (small amounts) and SS I will get more than when I was working. Maybe we will get them tomorrow for someones else's birthday. | |
| ID: 1103 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi all, | |
| ID: 1104 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Hi all, How much memory do we need exactly? I am seeing Linux WUs failing immediately, for example: http://vcsc.cs.uh.edu/virtual-prairie/workunit.php?wuid=5481258 | |
| ID: 1105 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
A bit more than 500MB/Task peak RAM usage (that's what the windows task manager says), I had to disable it on one quad that has only 2GB, with 4GB they run without trouble. | |
| ID: 1106 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
On my systems I see it using between 500 and 600 Megs of memory. Seems to very some from unit to unit. Running good on the system with 6 Gigs of memory, on the laptop with only 1 Gig some ran, many failed at the start. | |
| ID: 1109 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
I can run 3 WUs with my 8G RAM system, but I had to NNT FreeHal. | |
| ID: 1110 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It looks like the server needs a kick again..... | |
| ID: 1123 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
This batch has 2M wu. A bit more than a 100K have been created and around 90K of them are already done. | |
| ID: 1125 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
90% of mine errored out in 2secs. Such as this. | |
| ID: 1126 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
90% of mine errored out in 2secs. Such as this. Yup -- same thing I saw, as reported in this thread. | |
| ID: 1127 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
I can run 3 WUs with my 8G RAM system, but I had to NNT FreeHal. [edit]I meant to type 4G of RAM, not 8. (I wish)[/edit] Anyway, I can only run 3 WUs on my machine with 4G so, yeah, 8 WUs on a 3G computer would not work. | |
| ID: 1132 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Me too. I can start only 3 WU's on my 4 GB RAM Quad-machine. But since i was registered, i crunched over 100 WU's without an error. | |
| ID: 1133 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Me too. I can start only 3 WU's on my 4 GB RAM Quad-machine. But since i was registered, i crunched over 100 WU's without an error. That sounds like me, each duel core laptop has 2½ GB and dues two good. The duel core Athlon II runs good with 6 GB of memory, but the poor Phenom quad only has three GB. Not to much loss on the Phenom as it needs a new PS before any crunching, and only s 9500, rated at 2.2 but with the memory bug only getting about 1.9 GHz from it. After a new PS I probably will get a Phenom II 940 for that one and more memory. I have a Phenom II X2 555 (runs at 3.2 GHz), just have to decide which to use it in. With that being an AM3 I should replace the Athlon with it. Sure wish that my MB had an AMD 7 searies chipset to unlock the last two cores in that thing. | |
| ID: 1137 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
4/25/2010 8:10:20 AM Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent | |
| ID: 1138 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It looks like the server needs another kick today. | |
| ID: 1139 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation. 26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) or 26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged. My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply. | |
| ID: 1140 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation. 26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) or 26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged. My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply. | |
| ID: 1141 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation. 26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) or 26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged. My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply. | |
| ID: 1143 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Sorry for the multiple posts. There was no response and I retried a couple of times. | |
| ID: 1144 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Could it be that when this batch is over we will get a bonus a 3 credits per unit for all the server and memory problems? That would sound good. | |
| ID: 1146 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Sorry for the multiple posts. There was no response and I retried a couple of times. These boards aren't all that active. | |
| ID: 1147 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
This batch has 2M wu. A bit more than a 100K have been created and around 90K of them are already done. Could you let us know how far along we are in this batch? This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned. Hope that the next batch (or two) is as long as the one we are doing now. Ray | |
| ID: 1162 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Well, | |
| ID: 1165 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
That is bad for the project, but good for the ones of us who want to keep our computers buzy here. Looks like I have to get going and get the 4th cruncher working again. | |
| ID: 1167 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Well, I assume this is due to the huge memory requirements. Most people today have dual core machines at a minimum. And at >1gb per task required, that means 3-4gb needed to run this project, including the OS and other applications. Very few of those dual core machines have the memory required to successfully crunch this batch of tasks. Now imagine a quad core, or even worse yet, an i7 which will run 8 tasks at a time. They would need at least 12gb of RAM. I don't think you will find many machines out there with that kind of memory. ____________ Dublin, CA SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat | |
| ID: 1171 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Well, I have two Duel core systems working on this, two ot them have 2½ gb ram and do good. The resource monitor shows that there is still free ram but not a lot like usual on these. The 3rd duel core has 6Gb of ram so it can do just about anything. Most of the time it is running CPDN on one core and this om the 2nd core. When I turn CPDN off for while it dues 6 or seven an hour. This system has an AMD Athlon II 235e running at 2.7 Ghz. AMD published no info on the 235e, but most of the e chips at other speeds are detuned Phenom chips. This uses only 45 watts of power so getting 6 units an hour is good. The MB that I have it on dues not have any support for unlocking cores so I do not know if this has 2 more locked like other E chips. I tried AMD's overdrive program but the board has the wrong chip set to use it. The 4th system if it was running would have a hard time, it is a slow AND quad (Phenom 9500) with 3Gb of ram. If I get off my but and put the new PSU in it it should be able to only run two of these. With the 3GB it may also be able to run two CPDN units at the same time. Has anyone tried the new Phenom 1055T CPU? Six Core Processor - 2.80GHz, 6MB Cache. The 1090T would be better but cost a lot more. | |
| ID: 1172 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Phenom 1055T CPU running at @3,0 Ghz | |
| ID: 1176 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Phenom 1055T CPU running at @3,0 Ghz That is nice and at a much lower cost than the Intel CPU's. If you increase the memory to 8 Gigs it will really go good. | |
| ID: 1177 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
26 days without a post to this thread??? This one always had them. | |
| ID: 1200 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
26 days without a post to this thread??? This one always had them. We went for 18 (19?) days without a post in the entire forum! I have no idea how far along we are in this batch of work units. I'd be willing to bet the answer to the second question is no. | |
| ID: 1201 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Well, you guessed it right. We are at 75% of the batch now. | |
| ID: 1202 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Well, you guessed it right. We are at 75% of the batch now. No Bonus credit..... That is good, it would only draw people away from the higher credit projects and crash the server. This way keeps more units for those who like the project. | |
| ID: 1203 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
That is good, it would only draw people away from the higher credit projects and crash the server. This way keeps more units for those who like the project. I agree completely, it's better to have people who like to crunch the project, not credit hogs. ____________ | |
| ID: 1204 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Any word on when the next batch of work will be available? | |
| ID: 1245 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Any word on when the next batch of work will be available? No official word, but they were waiting for the last of the last batch to be finished. The last one was completed overnight. Being that this is a weekend we may have to wait for Monday. Hopefully Malek well see this and let us know. | |
| ID: 1246 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Database/file status | |
| ID: 1247 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hello all, | |
| ID: 1248 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
A few days it is. We'll happily crunch 'em when you give 'em. | |
| ID: 1249 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
No Problem, thank you for letting us know. | |
| ID: 1250 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Hello all, But, but, but Malek we need the work. Most crunchers here are old, really old and are retired. Without the work we have nothing to do other than running around on the streets getting into trouble. Before you know it you will be geting calls from police departments all over the world for you to go and bail out your crunchers. Before you know it all the women crunchers will be pregnant and they will blame you for a population explosion. And the retirement villages will be filled with little children. Do we need another 250 billion little crunchers running around? Most states will be passing Malek laws that will not allow old crunchers to enter them as the schools and jails will have to many crunchers. All the non crunchers will be taking time off from work to protest against the old crunchers who have no work and calling for a new Malek. The biggest complaint will be from the lack of food with all the baby crunchers to feed. If we do not get the work soon the world will not be a pretty at all. All of this from not having VIP to crunch. | |
| ID: 1251 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
..... <<< theme from Jeapardy >>> (the long version!!!) ..... | |
| ID: 1252 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Thank you Malek for these infos. | |
| ID: 1253 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
any news? | |
| ID: 1256 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Glad to see you back online! Any new work expected soon? | |
| ID: 1257 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
BUMP! | |
| ID: 1258 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi Malek, | |
| ID: 1259 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Hi all, Mimi?? | |
| ID: 1261 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Sorry all, I just couldn't understand how I found myself logged on with Mimi account!!!!! First time that happened and can't even know how it happened. Well this Hi all, is supposed to be my post. Sorry Mimi ____________ Malek | |
| ID: 1262 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Thanks for the info Mimi, eehh, Malek ;) Strange things happen sometimes. I'll be grazing the prairie when you let the plants grow again. | |
| ID: 1263 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi Malek, | |
| ID: 1264 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Good morning Malek | |
| ID: 1266 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Any word on when we will be getting some new units? Yeap, our CPU are ready to start. I hope the next week.... | |
| ID: 1267 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi all, | |
| ID: 1268 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
And is there supposed to be something like an @ and something more in front of the vcsc.cs.uh.edu? | |
| ID: 1269 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
For a moment I thought I'm loosing it and that my end was nigh, but then I saw you corrected your post after I posted mine. Also the url with the dot is still in my clipboard. So I'm still sane!! (as far as I'm concerned ;) ) | |
| ID: 1270 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
I see we have work again. Is there any word on how many units there will be this time? | |
| ID: 1411 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
The last WUs were very tasty! Will we get more of those? *yum yum* ;-))) | |
| ID: 1426 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Yes it's coming. Waiting for the last wus to add a new application version and restart the work generator. | |
| ID: 1427 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Awww, sweet! :-)))) | |
| ID: 1428 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
That didn't last too long | |
| ID: 1431 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
no work for days - any news? | |
| ID: 1437 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon. | |
| ID: 1438 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
... much faster than expected ... Oops ... sorry ;) | |
| ID: 1439 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon. We will try to make it last a little longer. ____________ Pizza@Home | My Stats | |
| ID: 1440 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
We will try to make it last a little longer. Good to hear! (Story of my life ... :-) ____________ | |
| ID: 1441 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon. not to sound impatient, but soon means? | |
| ID: 1443 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
not to sound impatient, but soon means? Today?! Please... hungry little cat is waiting! *big grin* ____________ Greetings from Cori | |
| ID: 1444 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
not to sound impatient, but soon means? Yes indeed! | |
| ID: 1445 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
The test series seemed to have worked quite well, you can bring on the large batch now | |
| ID: 1457 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
getting bored.... | |
| ID: 1459 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Just started a new batch of wus (200K). Let me know if anything goes wrong. | |
| ID: 1467 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Yippieh! It's nice to be 'riding over the prairie' again! *smiles* | |
| ID: 1468 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
time to refresh this.. | |
| ID: 1485 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Hi Malek, | |
| ID: 1487 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Sorry, nothing for now. | |
| ID: 1488 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
anyone out there? | |
| ID: 1489 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Just we peaceful WU grazers *g | |
| ID: 1490 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Simap will be put of work in about 5 days. That would be a good time for new work here. Probably will not happen but would be good. | |
| ID: 1491 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
any work coming soon? | |
| ID: 1492 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Still nothing in sight? | |
| ID: 1493 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Some work for your other BOINC project (SOFT) maybe? | |
| ID: 1494 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Sorry everyone, | |
| ID: 1495 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Congratulations! | |
| ID: 1496 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
3 months further down the road - any news? | |
| ID: 1499 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Wow!! Welcome back. What a nice surprise to see the website up again after so many months. Any good news for the eager crunchers after the long waiting? | |
| ID: 1502 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Any good news for the eager crunchers after the long waiting? I don't see any good news..... :-( | |
| ID: 1506 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It really has been a LONG time since we could do any crunching here. Anything scheduled (hoped - prayed) for the near future? | |
| ID: 1507 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
To those who just joined or are reading the posts before joining. | |
| ID: 1508 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Shame. | |
| ID: 1509 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
You can also read what's written on the main page : Note: So coming here to write dramatically "this is a dead project go away" without having actual information from anybody at the university or organism involved is a bit pointless. | |
| ID: 1510 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Quoted from AF>LePommierJerome: "So coming here to write dramatically "this is a dead project go away" without having actual information from anybody at the university or organism involved is a bit pointless" | |
| ID: 1511 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Here's the last quote from a project admin (Malek Smaoui) that I could find if anyone is interested. It's from June 30th of 2011: Sorry everyone, The last workunits made available from this site was from March of 2011 as noted by several different progress reporting sites. | |
| ID: 1512 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
+1 | |
| ID: 1513 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 : | |
| ID: 1514 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Pretty much unlikely though isn't it? | |
| ID: 1515 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 : Hopes.... | |
| ID: 1516 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 : That sounds a lot like VolPEx, which is a new project at the same university. http://volpex.cs.uh.edu/VCP/ ____________ | |
| ID: 1517 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
... and it is rather erratic with work availability too ... | |
| ID: 1518 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
No, that's just a link to a journal article Malek co-authored, published in January 2013 but apparently about ViP and written well over a year ago: "... intend to graduate in 2011" her bio paragraph says, at the end of the article. | |
| ID: 1519 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Grmbl ... over a year ago ... I didn't see that :-/ | |
| ID: 1520 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
|
Please, turn off your servers | |
| ID: 1521 | Rating: 0 | rate:
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : Any new work soon?