Any new work soon?

log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Any new work soon?

Author Message
Falconet
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 88
RAC: 0
Message 1057 - Posted: 12 Mar 2010 | 21:44:12 UTC

Willl there be any new work soon?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1062 - Posted: 26 Mar 2010 | 14:55:54 UTC - in response to Message 1057.

Hi all,

We started a new batch of WUs. There should be enough work for everybody for some time.
Happy crunching

Malek

Cesium_133*
Send message
Joined: 23 Jan 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 3,802
RAC: 0
Message 1063 - Posted: 26 Mar 2010 | 20:09:15 UTC - in response to Message 1057.

Will there be any new work soon?


Scored me about 4 WU's... I'm pumped... clonal plants growing across a prairie... sounds good to me :)
____________

SoftStag
Send message
Joined: 2 Mar 09
Posts: 15
Credit: 176,047
RAC: 0
Message 1078 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 5:07:38 UTC - in response to Message 1062.

Hi all,

We started a new batch of WUs. There should be enough work for everybody for some time.
Happy crunching

Malek

Hi Malek

Any idea how long these WUs may last?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1079 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 14:30:15 UTC - in response to Message 1078.

This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned.

Malek

DJStarfox
Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 3,735
RAC: 0
Message 1080 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 15:42:08 UTC - in response to Message 1079.

Hi, just joined the project. My Core i7 burns through the tasks with median completion time of 19 minutes each. Sounds like I joined just in time for all the work to do. :)

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1082 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 16:15:58 UTC - in response to Message 1079.

This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned.

Malek

Do you know if the next batches will be as long as this one?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1084 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 17:01:23 UTC - in response to Message 1082.

Some are as long as this one and some are even longer.

Malek

SoftStag
Send message
Joined: 2 Mar 09
Posts: 15
Credit: 176,047
RAC: 0
Message 1090 - Posted: 2 Apr 2010 | 4:17:43 UTC - in response to Message 1084.

Thanks for the update Malek. It's nice to have some VP work to do :o)

StandardbredHorse
Send message
Joined: 25 Jun 09
Posts: 18
Credit: 55,788
RAC: 0
Message 1093 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 | 16:19:22 UTC

Thanks Malek,

It looks like we burned through these WUs more quickly than planned. Only 10 on the server--are there more on the way from this batch, or will we wait for the new batch(es)?

By the way, nice use of the forum to communicate - it's much more efficient than emailing each member, as you'd said. I/we appreciate the updates - 1 quick post from you and then everyone can know what's going on. I'll spread the word to my team. Very easy, nice communication and sincerely appreciated.

Take care and best regards,

StandardbredHorse

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1095 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 | 20:45:42 UTC - in response to Message 1093.

Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow.


____________
Malek

zombie67 [MM]
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 23
Credit: 1,003,905
RAC: 0
Message 1100 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010 | 20:52:08 UTC - in response to Message 1095.

Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow.


Any news?
____________
Dublin, CA
SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1101 - Posted: 9 Apr 2010 | 15:52:05 UTC - in response to Message 1100.

Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow.


Any news?

Hope some will be released today for my birthday.

magyarficko
Send message
Joined: 17 Jun 09
Posts: 2
Credit: 103,236
RAC: 0
Message 1102 - Posted: 11 Apr 2010 | 20:22:52 UTC - in response to Message 1101.

Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow.


Any news?

Hope some will be released today for my birthday.


Well, happy belated birthday Ray. My birthday came and went yesterday and still nothing :(




____________

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1103 - Posted: 11 Apr 2010 | 23:11:44 UTC - in response to Message 1102.
Last modified: 11 Apr 2010 | 23:14:08 UTC

Yeah, seems my calculations were wrong. This batch is done, I will start the next one probably tomorrow.


Any news?

Hope some will be released today for my birthday.


Well, happy belated birthday Ray. My birthday came and went yesterday and still nothing :(




Even without the units I get to collect Social Security retirement with this one. This is good, with the pension, income from web sites (small amounts) and SS I will get more than when I was working.

Maybe we will get them tomorrow for someones else's birthday.

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1104 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 15:58:35 UTC - in response to Message 1103.

Hi all,

Sorry for being late in starting the new batch.
I just started it today, I hope everything will go fine with this one as well.
These wus require quite a bit of memory. I tried my best to reduce memory usage but that's all I could do (at least for now). I would understand if some of you decide not crunch from this batch because of the memory issue.

Thank you


____________
Malek

SoftStag
Send message
Joined: 2 Mar 09
Posts: 15
Credit: 176,047
RAC: 0
Message 1105 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 17:02:47 UTC - in response to Message 1104.

Hi all,

Sorry for being late in starting the new batch.
I just started it today, I hope everything will go fine with this one as well.
These wus require quite a bit of memory. I tried my best to reduce memory usage but that's all I could do (at least for now). I would understand if some of you decide not crunch from this batch because of the memory issue.

Thank you


How much memory do we need exactly? I am seeing Linux WUs failing immediately, for example: http://vcsc.cs.uh.edu/virtual-prairie/workunit.php?wuid=5481258

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1106 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 19:22:48 UTC - in response to Message 1105.
Last modified: 13 Apr 2010 | 19:27:47 UTC

A bit more than 500MB/Task peak RAM usage (that's what the windows task manager says), I had to disable it on one quad that has only 2GB, with 4GB they run without trouble.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1109 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 21:09:17 UTC
Last modified: 13 Apr 2010 | 21:12:05 UTC

On my systems I see it using between 500 and 600 Megs of memory. Seems to very some from unit to unit. Running good on the system with 6 Gigs of memory, on the laptop with only 1 Gig some ran, many failed at the start.

On the system with little memory I started CPDN with a high resource share to keep it running, that only allows one of these at a time and they are running.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1110 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 21:22:51 UTC
Last modified: 13 Apr 2010 | 21:23:32 UTC

I can run 3 WUs with my 8G RAM system, but I had to NNT FreeHal.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1123 - Posted: 16 Apr 2010 | 7:29:19 UTC

It looks like the server needs a kick again.....

Malek.
Is there any update on how this batch is doing on being completed? 10@, 50%? Or App. number of units in it?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1125 - Posted: 21 Apr 2010 | 17:43:00 UTC - in response to Message 1123.

This batch has 2M wu. A bit more than a 100K have been created and around 90K of them are already done.
____________
Malek

borandi
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 25,955
RAC: 0
Message 1126 - Posted: 21 Apr 2010 | 20:18:03 UTC
Last modified: 21 Apr 2010 | 20:28:10 UTC

90% of mine errored out in 2secs. Such as this.

Edit: looks like just plain mem errors, given the size of the WUs. Problem is when you have 8 threads in one machine and 3GB RAM, it'll error out at least 2 of the WUs, then it'll load up two more, those will error out, etc.

tng*
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 3
Credit: 5,331,180
RAC: 0
Message 1127 - Posted: 22 Apr 2010 | 0:14:24 UTC - in response to Message 1126.

90% of mine errored out in 2secs. Such as this.

Edit: looks like just plain mem errors, given the size of the WUs. Problem is when you have 8 threads in one machine and 3GB RAM, it'll error out at least 2 of the WUs, then it'll load up two more, those will error out, etc.


Yup -- same thing I saw, as reported in this thread.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1132 - Posted: 22 Apr 2010 | 20:12:14 UTC - in response to Message 1110.

I can run 3 WUs with my 8G RAM system, but I had to NNT FreeHal.

[edit]I meant to type 4G of RAM, not 8. (I wish)[/edit]
Anyway, I can only run 3 WUs on my machine with 4G so, yeah, 8 WUs on a 3G computer would not work.

Profile Monty
Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 4,815
RAC: 0
Message 1133 - Posted: 22 Apr 2010 | 22:10:51 UTC

Me too. I can start only 3 WU's on my 4 GB RAM Quad-machine. But since i was registered, i crunched over 100 WU's without an error.

regards Monty

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1137 - Posted: 24 Apr 2010 | 22:20:22 UTC - in response to Message 1133.

Me too. I can start only 3 WU's on my 4 GB RAM Quad-machine. But since i was registered, i crunched over 100 WU's without an error.

regards Monty

That sounds like me, each duel core laptop has 2½ GB and dues two good. The duel core Athlon II runs good with 6 GB of memory, but the poor Phenom quad only has three GB. Not to much loss on the Phenom as it needs a new PS before any crunching, and only s 9500, rated at 2.2 but with the memory bug only getting about 1.9 GHz from it. After a new PS I probably will get a Phenom II 940 for that one and more memory. I have a Phenom II X2 555 (runs at 3.2 GHz), just have to decide which to use it in. With that being an AM3 I should replace the Athlon with it. Sure wish that my MB had an AMD 7 searies chipset to unlock the last two cores in that thing.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1138 - Posted: 25 Apr 2010 | 13:36:32 UTC

4/25/2010 8:10:20 AM Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent
4/25/2010 8:10:20 AM Virtual Prairie Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms)

4/25/2010 8:14:16 AM Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent
4/25/2010 8:14:16 AM Virtual Prairie Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms)

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1139 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 11:44:29 UTC

It looks like the server needs another kick today.

Thyme Lawn
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 37,366
RAC: 0
Message 1140 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 16:43:12 UTC

It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation.

I reported a task at 26 Apr 2010 15:52:33 UTC but the one I first tried to report 41 seconds later isn't being acknowledged. Scheduler replies are either:

26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)

or

26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent

In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged.

My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply.

Thyme Lawn
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 37,366
RAC: 0
Message 1141 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 16:46:18 UTC

It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation.

I reported a task at 26 Apr 2010 15:52:33 UTC but the one I first tried to report 41 seconds later isn't being acknowledged. Scheduler replies are either:

26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)

or

26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent

In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged.

My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply.

Thyme Lawn
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 37,366
RAC: 0
Message 1143 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 17:00:56 UTC

It looks like there might be a problem with the result table and/or work generation.

I reported a task at 26 Apr 2010 15:52:33 UTC but the one I first tried to report 41 seconds later isn't being acknowledged. Scheduler replies are either:

26/04/2010 17:08:22 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:08:27 Virtual Prairie Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)

or

26/04/2010 17:09:02 Virtual Prairie Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/04/2010 17:09:07 Virtual Prairie Message from server: No work sent

In the second case the scheduler reply contains <workunit> blocks but no <result> blocks. I tried setting the project to no new work and the pending result still wasn't acknowledged.

My latest request to get a "No work sent" response contained non-tasks from workunits vip_multi_run12_1272276303_226952, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227293, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227395, vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227295 and vip_multi_run12_1272276303_227296 in the scheduler reply.

Thyme Lawn
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 37,366
RAC: 0
Message 1144 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 19:32:40 UTC

Sorry for the multiple posts. There was no response and I retried a couple of times.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1146 - Posted: 26 Apr 2010 | 20:00:34 UTC

Could it be that when this batch is over we will get a bonus a 3 credits per unit for all the server and memory problems? That would sound good.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1147 - Posted: 27 Apr 2010 | 0:20:20 UTC - in response to Message 1144.

Sorry for the multiple posts. There was no response and I retried a couple of times.

These boards aren't all that active.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1162 - Posted: 10 May 2010 | 17:11:21 UTC - in response to Message 1125.

This batch has 2M wu. A bit more than a 100K have been created and around 90K of them are already done.

Could you let us know how far along we are in this batch?

This batch will last probably till the middle of next week. Then, I will start 3 or 4 other batches if everything goes as planned.

Malek

Hope that the next batch (or two) is as long as the one we are doing now.
Ray

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1165 - Posted: 11 May 2010 | 18:46:40 UTC - in response to Message 1162.
Last modified: 11 May 2010 | 18:46:56 UTC

Well,

Work is progressing much slower than predicted. 2/3 of the wus aren't yet processed.
____________
Malek

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1167 - Posted: 12 May 2010 | 14:23:57 UTC

That is bad for the project, but good for the ones of us who want to keep our computers buzy here. Looks like I have to get going and get the 4th cruncher working again.

zombie67 [MM]
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 23
Credit: 1,003,905
RAC: 0
Message 1171 - Posted: 13 May 2010 | 3:57:41 UTC - in response to Message 1165.
Last modified: 13 May 2010 | 4:00:09 UTC

Well,

Work is progressing much slower than predicted. 2/3 of the wus aren't yet processed.


I assume this is due to the huge memory requirements. Most people today have dual core machines at a minimum. And at >1gb per task required, that means 3-4gb needed to run this project, including the OS and other applications. Very few of those dual core machines have the memory required to successfully crunch this batch of tasks. Now imagine a quad core, or even worse yet, an i7 which will run 8 tasks at a time. They would need at least 12gb of RAM. I don't think you will find many machines out there with that kind of memory.
____________
Dublin, CA
SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1172 - Posted: 13 May 2010 | 14:20:13 UTC - in response to Message 1171.
Last modified: 13 May 2010 | 14:20:42 UTC

Well,

Work is progressing much slower than predicted. 2/3 of the wus aren't yet processed.


I assume this is due to the huge memory requirements. Most people today have dual core machines at a minimum. And at >1gb per task required, that means 3-4gb needed to run this project, including the OS and other applications. Very few of those dual core machines have the memory required to successfully crunch this batch of tasks. Now imagine a quad core, or even worse yet, an i7 which will run 8 tasks at a time. They would need at least 12gb of RAM. I don't think you will find many machines out there with that kind of memory.

I have two Duel core systems working on this, two ot them have 2½ gb ram and do good. The resource monitor shows that there is still free ram but not a lot like usual on these.

The 3rd duel core has 6Gb of ram so it can do just about anything. Most of the time it is running CPDN on one core and this om the 2nd core. When I turn CPDN off for while it dues 6 or seven an hour. This system has an AMD Athlon II 235e running at 2.7 Ghz. AMD published no info on the 235e, but most of the e chips at other speeds are detuned Phenom chips. This uses only 45 watts of power so getting 6 units an hour is good. The MB that I have it on dues not have any support for unlocking cores so I do not know if this has 2 more locked like other E chips. I tried AMD's overdrive program but the board has the wrong chip set to use it.

The 4th system if it was running would have a hard time, it is a slow AND quad (Phenom 9500) with 3Gb of ram. If I get off my but and put the new PSU in it it should be able to only run two of these. With the 3GB it may also be able to run two CPDN units at the same time.

Has anyone tried the new Phenom 1055T CPU? Six Core Processor - 2.80GHz, 6MB Cache. The 1090T would be better but cost a lot more.

steinrar
Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 785,923
RAC: 0
Message 1176 - Posted: 16 May 2010 | 18:57:41 UTC - in response to Message 1172.

Phenom 1055T CPU running at @3,0 Ghz
http://vcsc.cs.uh.edu/virtual-prairie/show_host_detail.php?hostid=14438

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1177 - Posted: 18 May 2010 | 11:58:17 UTC - in response to Message 1176.

Phenom 1055T CPU running at @3,0 Ghz
http://vcsc.cs.uh.edu/virtual-prairie/show_host_detail.php?hostid=14438

That is nice and at a much lower cost than the Intel CPU's. If you increase the memory to 8 Gigs it will really go good.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1200 - Posted: 14 Jun 2010 | 1:09:43 UTC
Last modified: 14 Jun 2010 | 1:10:31 UTC

26 days without a post to this thread??? This one always had them.

To stop the no posting streak I guess I will put in a couple stupid questions.

Are we about 75 - 80% completed on this batch?

Do we get bonus credits at the end for the high memory use? I did say stupid questions.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1201 - Posted: 14 Jun 2010 | 9:07:19 UTC - in response to Message 1200.

26 days without a post to this thread??? This one always had them.

To stop the no posting streak I guess I will put in a couple stupid questions.

Are we about 75 - 80% completed on this batch?

Do we get bonus credits at the end for the high memory use? I did say stupid questions.

We went for 18 (19?) days without a post in the entire forum! I have no idea how far along we are in this batch of work units. I'd be willing to bet the answer to the second question is no.

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1202 - Posted: 14 Jun 2010 | 20:42:46 UTC - in response to Message 1200.

Well, you guessed it right. We are at 75% of the batch now.
And for the credit question, I think the wus are already well paid even considering the memory usage. So, sorry, no bonuses.
____________
Malek

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1203 - Posted: 15 Jun 2010 | 16:39:46 UTC - in response to Message 1202.

Well, you guessed it right. We are at 75% of the batch now.
And for the credit question, I think the wus are already well paid even considering the memory usage. So, sorry, no bonuses.

No Bonus credit.....
That is good, it would only draw people away from the higher credit projects and crash the server. This way keeps more units for those who like the project.

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1204 - Posted: 15 Jun 2010 | 19:15:06 UTC - in response to Message 1203.

That is good, it would only draw people away from the higher credit projects and crash the server. This way keeps more units for those who like the project.

I agree completely, it's better to have people who like to crunch the project, not credit hogs.
____________

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1245 - Posted: 17 Jul 2010 | 13:29:51 UTC

Any word on when the next batch of work will be available?
____________

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1246 - Posted: 17 Jul 2010 | 14:00:02 UTC - in response to Message 1245.

Any word on when the next batch of work will be available?

No official word, but they were waiting for the last of the last batch to be finished. The last one was completed overnight. Being that this is a weekend we may have to wait for Monday. Hopefully Malek well see this and let us know.

Profile theharperdragon
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 101,826
RAC: 0
Message 1247 - Posted: 19 Jul 2010 | 12:32:00 UTC

Database/file status
State #
Results ready to send 0
Results in progress 0
Workunits waiting for validation 0
Workunits waiting for assimilation 0
Workunits waiting for deletion 0
Results waiting for deletion 0
Transitioner backlog (hours) 0


.... waiting patiently for my next batch !!!!!!!!!!

LOL

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1248 - Posted: 20 Jul 2010 | 17:20:48 UTC - in response to Message 1247.

Hello all,

Sorry to inform you that you will have to wait for few days before I can get the new batches running. I need to deal with other issues before.
Thanks for understanding.

Malek
____________
Malek

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1249 - Posted: 20 Jul 2010 | 19:14:37 UTC

A few days it is. We'll happily crunch 'em when you give 'em.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1250 - Posted: 20 Jul 2010 | 23:52:17 UTC

No Problem, thank you for letting us know.

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1251 - Posted: 21 Jul 2010 | 13:35:55 UTC - in response to Message 1248.
Last modified: 21 Jul 2010 | 13:57:30 UTC

Hello all,

Sorry to inform you that you will have to wait for few days before I can get the new batches running. I need to deal with other issues before.
Thanks for understanding.

Malek

But, but, but
Malek we need the work.
Most crunchers here are old, really old and are retired.

Without the work we have nothing to do other than running around on the streets getting into trouble. Before you know it you will be geting calls from police departments all over the world for you to go and bail out your crunchers.

Before you know it all the women crunchers will be pregnant and they will blame you for a population explosion. And the retirement villages will be filled with little children. Do we need another 250 billion little crunchers running around?

Most states will be passing Malek laws that will not allow old crunchers to enter them as the schools and jails will have to many crunchers.

All the non crunchers will be taking time off from work to protest against the old crunchers who have no work and calling for a new Malek. The biggest complaint will be from the lack of food with all the baby crunchers to feed.

If we do not get the work soon the world will not be a pretty at all. All of this from not having VIP to crunch.

Profile theharperdragon
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 101,826
RAC: 0
Message 1252 - Posted: 21 Jul 2010 | 15:43:20 UTC - in response to Message 1251.

..... <<< theme from Jeapardy >>> (the long version!!!) .....

Profile al@ON
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 6
Credit: 305,120
RAC: 0
Message 1253 - Posted: 24 Jul 2010 | 23:37:01 UTC

Thank you Malek for these infos.
____________


"Libre de penser... pensez Libre" =8?()>

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1256 - Posted: 9 Aug 2010 | 14:27:54 UTC

any news?

Profile skivelitis
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 15,969
RAC: 0
Message 1257 - Posted: 17 Aug 2010 | 23:20:06 UTC

Glad to see you back online! Any new work expected soon?
____________

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1258 - Posted: 27 Aug 2010 | 16:22:23 UTC - in response to Message 1257.

BUMP!

dividedbymyself
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 62,257
RAC: 0
Message 1259 - Posted: 31 Aug 2010 | 15:00:58 UTC
Last modified: 31 Aug 2010 | 15:04:41 UTC

Hi Malek,

your latest news was well over a month ago that it would take a few days for the new batches to be released to the wild. Your predators are getting hungry, so could you please give us some info as to what we can expect? Is this a dry season as announced on the front page?

Thanks for your reply in advance,
Bart

dividedbymyself
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 62,257
RAC: 0
Message 1261 - Posted: 31 Aug 2010 | 17:17:09 UTC - in response to Message 1260.

Hi all,

Yes I promised new work around a month ago but I had to take care of other issues before and it took much longer than expected.
The batches are still planned but I can't say when I'm going to launch them.

I'll post to the board once I get these batches started.

Thank you all


Mimi??

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1262 - Posted: 31 Aug 2010 | 17:22:41 UTC - in response to Message 1261.



Mimi??



Sorry all, I just couldn't understand how I found myself logged on with Mimi account!!!!! First time that happened and can't even know how it happened.

Well this
Hi all,

Yes I promised new work around a month ago but I had to take care of other issues before and it took much longer than expected.
The batches are still planned but I can't say when I'm going to launch them.

I'll post to the board once I get these batches started.

Thank you all

is supposed to be my post.

Sorry Mimi



____________
Malek

dividedbymyself
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 62,257
RAC: 0
Message 1263 - Posted: 31 Aug 2010 | 20:25:26 UTC - in response to Message 1262.

Thanks for the info Mimi, eehh, Malek ;) Strange things happen sometimes. I'll be grazing the prairie when you let the plants grow again.

Bart

Profile ovattier
Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 09
Posts: 3
Credit: 44,601
RAC: 0
Message 1264 - Posted: 19 Sep 2010 | 21:51:48 UTC

Hi Malek,

Do you have any news about news WU...?

thanks and have a nice day!

olivier
____________

Profile theharperdragon
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 101,826
RAC: 0
Message 1266 - Posted: 27 Sep 2010 | 10:34:15 UTC - in response to Message 1264.

Good morning Malek
It's now closing in on October and still no new work units.
Any word on when we will be getting some new units?

Profile [VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 16,921
RAC: 0
Message 1267 - Posted: 1 Oct 2010 | 14:13:26 UTC - in response to Message 1266.

Any word on when we will be getting some new units?

Yeap, our CPU are ready to start. I hope the next week....

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1268 - Posted: 6 Oct 2010 | 18:03:24 UTC - in response to Message 1267.
Last modified: 6 Oct 2010 | 19:47:43 UTC

Hi all,

I'm testing few workunits for the next batch which will start (if everything os OK) right after the test wus are done.

Thank you all for your patience.

One of you suggested (via email) that we establish a mailing list to announce availability of workunits. Anyone who would like to join the mailing list please send an empty email to vcsc@cs.uh.edu with subject "announcement mailing list"
____________
Malek

dividedbymyself
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 62,257
RAC: 0
Message 1269 - Posted: 6 Oct 2010 | 19:41:11 UTC - in response to Message 1268.
Last modified: 6 Oct 2010 | 19:41:46 UTC

And is there supposed to be something like an @ and something more in front of the vcsc.cs.uh.edu?

dividedbymyself
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 62,257
RAC: 0
Message 1270 - Posted: 6 Oct 2010 | 23:12:14 UTC - in response to Message 1269.
Last modified: 6 Oct 2010 | 23:19:52 UTC

For a moment I thought I'm loosing it and that my end was nigh, but then I saw you corrected your post after I posted mine. Also the url with the dot is still in my clipboard. So I'm still sane!! (as far as I'm concerned ;) )

Thanks for the correction Malek, expect a mail from me.

Bart

Edit:
Btw, you could maybe also post RSS news?

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1411 - Posted: 21 Dec 2010 | 4:04:41 UTC

I see we have work again. Is there any word on how many units there will be this time?

Profile Cori
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 123
Credit: 107,878
RAC: 0
Message 1426 - Posted: 16 Jan 2011 | 15:15:26 UTC

The last WUs were very tasty! Will we get more of those? *yum yum* ;-)))
____________
Greetings from Cori

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1427 - Posted: 18 Jan 2011 | 18:05:06 UTC - in response to Message 1426.

Yes it's coming. Waiting for the last wus to add a new application version and restart the work generator.

Malek
____________
Malek

Profile Cori
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 123
Credit: 107,878
RAC: 0
Message 1428 - Posted: 18 Jan 2011 | 21:05:33 UTC - in response to Message 1427.

Awww, sweet! :-))))
I am looking forward to the new crrrrrunchies then. *smiles*
____________
Greetings from Cori

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1431 - Posted: 20 Jan 2011 | 14:16:31 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jan 2011 | 14:17:08 UTC

That didn't last too long

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1437 - Posted: 26 Jan 2011 | 16:05:35 UTC - in response to Message 1431.

no work for days - any news?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1438 - Posted: 27 Jan 2011 | 20:51:15 UTC - in response to Message 1437.

The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon.

Malek
____________
Malek

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1439 - Posted: 27 Jan 2011 | 22:58:17 UTC - in response to Message 1438.

... much faster than expected ...


Oops ... sorry ;)

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1440 - Posted: 29 Jan 2011 | 18:37:47 UTC - in response to Message 1438.

The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon.

Malek

We will try to make it last a little longer.
____________
Pizza@Home | My Stats

Chris S
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 10
Posts: 11
Credit: 164,471
RAC: 0
Message 1441 - Posted: 30 Jan 2011 | 13:51:45 UTC

We will try to make it last a little longer.


Good to hear!

(Story of my life ... :-)
____________

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1443 - Posted: 1 Feb 2011 | 20:44:45 UTC - in response to Message 1438.

The current batch is done (much faster than expected) but another one (not much larger) is coming soon.

Malek


not to sound impatient, but soon means?

Profile Cori
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 123
Credit: 107,878
RAC: 0
Message 1444 - Posted: 2 Feb 2011 | 14:13:45 UTC - in response to Message 1443.

not to sound impatient, but soon means?


Today?!

Please... hungry little cat is waiting! *big grin*


____________
Greetings from Cori

Odd-Rod
Send message
Joined: 5 Apr 08
Posts: 10
Credit: 12,564
RAC: 0
Message 1445 - Posted: 2 Feb 2011 | 22:08:39 UTC - in response to Message 1444.

not to sound impatient, but soon means?


Today?!


Yes indeed!

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1457 - Posted: 9 Feb 2011 | 20:57:39 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2011 | 20:58:07 UTC

The test series seemed to have worked quite well, you can bring on the large batch now

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1459 - Posted: 14 Feb 2011 | 15:39:28 UTC

getting bored....

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1467 - Posted: 24 Feb 2011 | 21:56:41 UTC - in response to Message 1459.

Just started a new batch of wus (200K). Let me know if anything goes wrong.
____________
Malek

Profile Cori
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 08
Posts: 123
Credit: 107,878
RAC: 0
Message 1468 - Posted: 24 Feb 2011 | 22:18:54 UTC - in response to Message 1467.

Yippieh! It's nice to be 'riding over the prairie' again! *smiles*
____________
Greetings from Cori

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1485 - Posted: 8 Mar 2011 | 17:23:40 UTC

time to refresh this..

Profile al@ON
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 6
Credit: 305,120
RAC: 0
Message 1487 - Posted: 17 Mar 2011 | 9:34:45 UTC

Hi Malek,

No clonal plant to be put under the tooth...

Good crunch @ all.
____________


"Libre de penser... pensez Libre" =8?()>

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1488 - Posted: 17 Mar 2011 | 14:46:19 UTC - in response to Message 1487.

Sorry, nothing for now.

____________
Malek

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1489 - Posted: 11 Apr 2011 | 16:20:43 UTC - in response to Message 1057.

anyone out there?

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1490 - Posted: 11 Apr 2011 | 23:50:20 UTC - in response to Message 1489.
Last modified: 11 Apr 2011 | 23:54:19 UTC

Just we peaceful WU grazers *g

[B@H] Ray
Send message
Joined: 29 May 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 451,077
RAC: 0
Message 1491 - Posted: 23 Apr 2011 | 21:16:57 UTC

Simap will be put of work in about 5 days. That would be a good time for new work here. Probably will not happen but would be good.
____________
Pizza@Home | My Stats

Bofferbrauer
Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 21,105
RAC: 0
Message 1492 - Posted: 17 May 2011 | 16:17:09 UTC

any work coming soon?

Bofferbrauer
Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 21,105
RAC: 0
Message 1493 - Posted: 19 Jun 2011 | 15:01:57 UTC

Still nothing in sight?

Quite some time since the last WU arrived now
____________

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1494 - Posted: 20 Jun 2011 | 18:11:39 UTC

Some work for your other BOINC project (SOFT) maybe?

Malek Smaoui
Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 07
Posts: 132
Credit: 32,039
RAC: 0
Message 1495 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011 | 22:27:44 UTC - in response to Message 1494.

Sorry everyone,
Nothing in sight yet, the ecologists are concentrating on experiments at this time. And for me, well, I'm on a maternity leave for now.

Malek
____________
Malek

swiftmallard
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 10
Posts: 50
Credit: 166,727
RAC: 0
Message 1496 - Posted: 4 Jul 2011 | 23:19:18 UTC

Congratulations!

frankhagen
Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 27
Credit: 486,019
RAC: 0
Message 1499 - Posted: 4 Oct 2011 | 14:09:11 UTC

3 months further down the road - any news?

Profile philip-in-hongkong
Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 17,790
RAC: 0
Message 1502 - Posted: 10 Jul 2012 | 17:00:57 UTC - in response to Message 1499.

Wow!! Welcome back. What a nice surprise to see the website up again after so many months. Any good news for the eager crunchers after the long waiting?

Profile [VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 16,921
RAC: 0
Message 1506 - Posted: 13 Sep 2012 | 10:16:35 UTC - in response to Message 1502.

Any good news for the eager crunchers after the long waiting?


I don't see any good news..... :-(

Profile theharperdragon
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 101,826
RAC: 0
Message 1507 - Posted: 28 Sep 2012 | 14:21:01 UTC - in response to Message 1506.

It really has been a LONG time since we could do any crunching here. Anything scheduled (hoped - prayed) for the near future?

DGG
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,387
RAC: 0
Message 1508 - Posted: 7 Oct 2012 | 19:36:12 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2012 | 19:52:20 UTC

To those who just joined or are reading the posts before joining.

I am not in any way a project admin for this project. But I will warn you not to waste your time with attaching to and waiting for workunits for this project. It is apparently a dead project. If you want to wait for many months its your time but why waste it? There are many reliable projects out there to devote your time to.

There have been no new work units since March of 2011. (Over a year and a half ago at the time of this writing.) The last post from an administrator was June of 2011. The web site has gone through many issues and hasn't been updated for some time. The project admins haven't updated people with any current status either. Frankly, the web pages should have been shut down and the project properly terminated but it wasn't.

So in all likeliness this is a dead project and a waste of your time.

Euphoriabuzz
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Jun 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 635
RAC: 0
Message 1509 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012 | 7:03:39 UTC - in response to Message 1057.
Last modified: 16 Oct 2012 | 7:04:34 UTC

Shame.

[AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005
Send message
Joined: 13 Oct 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 56,390
RAC: 0
Message 1510 - Posted: 3 Jan 2013 | 12:22:52 UTC

You can also read what's written on the main page :

Note:
- The project comes across long periods of inactivity (no workunits available). During these periods, we are extensively studying the outcome of the previous workunits and reflecting these results on the application and the coming workunits.
- We are establishing a mailing list to announce the availability of new workunits. If you would like to join this mailing list, please send an empty email to VCSC AT CS DOT UH DOT EDU with subject "announcement mailing list".


So coming here to write dramatically "this is a dead project go away" without having actual information from anybody at the university or organism involved is a bit pointless.

DGG
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,387
RAC: 0
Message 1511 - Posted: 11 Jan 2013 | 9:58:13 UTC - in response to Message 1510.
Last modified: 11 Jan 2013 | 10:53:36 UTC

Quoted from AF>LePommierJerome: "So coming here to write dramatically "this is a dead project go away" without having actual information from anybody at the university or organism involved is a bit pointless"

To AF>LePommierJerome: 1st off don't misquote me as saying "this is a dead project go away". If you are going to put something in quotes be sure it's actually what I said rather than your own version that you inserted here. I didn't say that. You make it sound as if I just came here to complain. I too have contributed to VP before it quit providing workunits. It was a poor at best project then. But I continued to contribute with work as I could. I've got just as much right to post here as you do. I probably would have continued if workunits were available. But the way the admins here just disappeared can't be at least a little concerning to you? I'm not a BOINC newbe and didn't just come here to complain. I too wanted to know what was going on and was never given an answer to anything by the project admins. The reality is that when the admins abandon a project's community for years it's likely it's a dead project.

Someone did need to warn new people looking for new projects to think about avoiding this one as they'll get no work. Most new users appreciate information like this so they don't waste their time on projects which no longer exist but keep their servers going endlessly giving the impression they are active. New users want work units not your form of wishful thinking.

The homepage explains nothing. That info was put there years ago to explain how they originally then would have a week or two delay between work units. I guess you think that's being dramatic? What would you call defending a site that has had no work since March of 2011, almost two years ago? This is a dead project by almost anyone's definition. It's homepage should have been updated with current info or shut down. Neither was done. So I'm just trying to help new users not waste their time on places like this. Any admin could speak up and let users know that new workunits are coming soon or that they are soon to start up again, but no one has.

One of the things that drive away new users is getting stuck by choosing their new projects and waiting for weeks or months (or in this case years) for work and having you give them the impression there is hope and they should just wait. After two or three of these they just quit BOINC and go away. The community then loses a user who could have contributed to some other worthy projects. This is not one of them! Do the new users a favor and don't fill them with hope this project will be starting up any time soon. You're also not an administrator apparently so your comments by your own definition are as pointless as mine.

The project admins have obviously abandoned it as they haven't updated anything for years. Someone just forgot to kill the servers when everyone left it. Any project admin could have responded to the months of requests from current users asking what was going on. They chose not to and probably aren't even reading the forums anymore. They could have suspended new enrollment if it was in hiatus. They didn't. They could have put a simple message on the homepage about quitting but they didn't. The problem is the new users do choose projects based on homepages that are still active. Then when they get no workunits they come to the message forums for info on why. They are looking for info about why they don't get new work units not a please wait some more kind of response. New users need to be warned of this before wasting their time on what they think is an active project when it isn't.

No information from the project admins for years implies that the project is dead. If you want to wait for years for work it's your perogitive. But don't criticize those who try to help new users by telling them nothing is happening here and isn't likely to any time soon. I specifically said in my post I was not an administrator. I, as many other users did try in vain to contact the administrators who don't respond. It's your years of waiting Jerome that could be thought of as a bit pointless! But that's your choice. Just don't give others the same false hope you have unless you yourself have heard something from the admins about it restarting up again.

DGG
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,387
RAC: 0
Message 1512 - Posted: 11 Jan 2013 | 11:10:00 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jan 2013 | 11:29:44 UTC

Here's the last quote from a project admin (Malek Smaoui) that I could find if anyone is interested. It's from June 30th of 2011:

Sorry everyone,
Nothing in sight yet, the ecologists are concentrating on experiments at this time. And for me, well, I'm on a maternity leave for now.

Malek


The last workunits made available from this site was from March of 2011 as noted by several different progress reporting sites.

Profile [VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 16,921
RAC: 0
Message 1513 - Posted: 13 Jan 2013 | 15:24:53 UTC - in response to Message 1511.


The project admins have obviously abandoned it as they haven't updated anything for years. Someone just forgot to kill the servers when everyone left it. Any project admin could have responded to the months of requests from current users asking what was going on. They chose not to and probably aren't even reading the forums anymore. They could have suspended new enrollment if it was in hiatus. They didn't. They could have put a simple message on the homepage about quitting but they didn't. The problem is the new users do choose projects based on homepages that are still active. Then when they get no workunits they come to the message forums for info on why. They are looking for info about why they don't get new work units not a please wait some more kind of response. New users need to be warned of this before wasting their time on what they think is an active project when it isn't.

No information from the project admins for years implies that the project is dead. If you want to wait for years for work it's your perogitive. But don't criticize those who try to help new users by telling them nothing is happening here and isn't likely to any time soon. I specifically said in my post I was not an administrator. I, as many other users did try in vain to contact the administrators who don't respond. It's your years of waiting Jerome that could be thought of as a bit pointless! But that's your choice. Just don't give others the same false hope you have unless you yourself have heard something from the admins about it restarting up again.


+1

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1514 - Posted: 22 Feb 2013 | 15:02:59 UTC

It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 :

Improving volunteer computing scheduling for evolutionary algorithms

Chris S
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 10
Posts: 11
Credit: 164,471
RAC: 0
Message 1515 - Posted: 25 Feb 2013 | 13:20:53 UTC

Pretty much unlikely though isn't it?


____________

Profile [VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 16,921
RAC: 0
Message 1516 - Posted: 4 Mar 2013 | 8:17:23 UTC - in response to Message 1514.

It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 :

Improving volunteer computing scheduling for evolutionary algorithms


Hopes....

David Ball
Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 267,749
RAC: 0
Message 1517 - Posted: 6 Mar 2013 | 4:03:35 UTC - in response to Message 1514.

It might not be dead, this is dated 2013 :

Improving volunteer computing scheduling for evolutionary algorithms


That sounds a lot like VolPEx, which is a new project at the same university.

http://volpex.cs.uh.edu/VCP/
____________

Profile theharperdragon
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 101,826
RAC: 0
Message 1518 - Posted: 6 Mar 2013 | 19:30:15 UTC - in response to Message 1517.

... and it is rather erratic with work availability too ...

Traills
Send message
Joined: 15 Oct 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 53,368
RAC: 0
Message 1519 - Posted: 14 Mar 2013 | 7:19:56 UTC - in response to Message 1517.

No, that's just a link to a journal article Malek co-authored, published in January 2013 but apparently about ViP and written well over a year ago: "... intend to graduate in 2011" her bio paragraph says, at the end of the article.

Ananas
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 1,923,197
RAC: 0
Message 1520 - Posted: 16 Mar 2013 | 22:43:34 UTC

Grmbl ... over a year ago ... I didn't see that :-/

There is another project, it's about optimizing savonius rotors, I wonder if it will go public some day or if it was only a proof of concept for this project.

Profile [VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 16,921
RAC: 0
Message 1521 - Posted: 11 Jun 2013 | 14:06:43 UTC - in response to Message 1520.

Please, turn off your servers
They are consuming electricity for nothing....

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Any new work soon?


Return to Virtual Prairie main page
Copyright © 2013 University of Houston